- Exceptional sound clarity
- Comfortable for long sessions
- Durable build quality
- Affordable price
- Comfortable fit
- Balanced sound
- Not portable
- Requires amplifier for best performance
- Plastic build quality
- Not fully closed-back
AKG K702 vs AKG K240 Studio
When it comes to high-quality audio monitoring, AKG headphones are a popular choice among audio engineers, musicians, and audiophiles. Two models that often come up in discussions are the AKG K702 and the AKG K240 Studio. While both models share some similarities, they also have distinct differences that set them apart. In this comparison, we'll delve into the features, sound quality, and design of each model to help you decide which one is best for your needs.
Design and Build
The AKG K702 and K240 Studio both feature a closed-back design, but with some notable differences. The K702 has a more modern and sleek appearance, with a sturdy plastic and metal construction that exudes a sense of premium quality. The ear cups are large and comfortable, with a soft, velour-like material that provides excellent cushioning. In contrast, the K240 Studio has a more traditional design, with a mostly plastic build that's slightly lighter in weight. The ear cups are also smaller and have a more compact fit.
Sound Quality
Both models are known for their accurate and detailed sound reproduction, but they differ in terms of frequency response and tone. The AKG K702 is renowned for its neutral and balanced sound, with a flat frequency response that's ideal for mixing and mastering applications. It has a wide soundstage and excellent imaging, making it perfect for monitoring complex audio tracks. On the other hand, the K240 Studio has a slightly warmer and more colored sound, with an emphasis on mid-range frequencies. This makes it well-suited for tracking and recording applications where a more forgiving tone is desired.
Frequency Response
The AKG K702 has a frequency response of 10 Hz to 39.8 kHz, while the K240 Studio has a slightly narrower range of 15 Hz to 25 kHz. The K702's extended high-frequency response makes it better suited for applications where detailed high-end clarity is required, such as mastering and post-production.
Comfort and Ergonomics
Both models are designed for long listening sessions, but the AKG K702 is generally considered more comfortable due to its larger ear cups and softer cushioning. The headband is also adjustable, allowing for a secure fit on heads of various sizes. The K240 Studio, while still comfortable, has a slightly tighter fit and less padding around the ears.
Cable and Connectivity
The AKG K702 comes with a detachable cable that's terminated with a 3-pin XLR connector, making it easy to swap out cables or use with different equipment. The K240 Studio, on the other hand, has a fixed cable with a 3.5mm TRS connector.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both the AKG K702 and K240 Studio are excellent choices for anyone seeking high-quality audio monitoring from their AKG headphones. While the K702 excels in terms of neutral sound reproduction and comfort, the K240 Studio offers a more affordable option with a warmer tone that's well-suited for tracking and recording applications. Ultimately, the choice between these two models will depend on your specific needs and preferences. If you prioritize accuracy and detail, the AKG K702 may be the better choice. However, if you're looking for a more forgiving tone and a budget-friendly option, the K240 Studio is definitely worth considering.






















