- High-definition video
- Durable design
- Advanced safety features
- High-quality imaging
- Portable and lightweight
- Innovative gimbal
- Limited battery life
- Higher price point
- Shorter flight time
- Limited range
Autel Robotics EVO Lite+ vs Parrot Anafi FPV
The world of high-end drones has just gotten more exciting with the introduction of two cutting-edge models: the Autel Robotics EVO Lite+ and the Parrot Anafi FPV. Both drones are designed to provide an unparalleled flying experience, but they differ in several key aspects. In this comparison, we'll delve into the features, performance, and capabilities of these two premium drones, including their suitability as auto-follow drones.
Design and Build
The Autel Robotics EVO Lite+ boasts a sleek and sturdy design, with a compact folding frame that makes it easy to transport. The drone's body is made of high-quality materials, ensuring durability and resistance to harsh weather conditions. In contrast, the Parrot Anafi FPV features a more unique, insect-like design with a distinctive orange and black color scheme. While both drones are well-built, the EVO Lite+ seems to have a more rugged and robust construction.
Camera Capabilities
When it comes to camera performance, both drones excel in their own ways. The Autel Robotics EVO Lite+ is equipped with a 1-inch sensor camera that captures stunning 50MP photos and 8K video at 30fps. The camera also features a wide-angle lens, allowing for breathtaking panoramic shots. On the other hand, the Parrot Anafi FPV boasts a 21MP camera with a 3-axis gimbal, capable of shooting 4K video at 60fps. While the EVO Lite+ has a higher resolution sensor, the Anafi FPV's camera is more versatile, with features like HDR and slow-motion recording.
Flight Performance
Both drones are designed for high-performance flight, but they differ in their aerodynamics and maneuverability. The Autel Robotics EVO Lite+ has a top speed of 45mph (72km/h) and can withstand winds up to 23mph (37km/h). The Parrot Anafi FPV, on the other hand, reaches speeds of up to 35mph (56km/h) and is more agile in tight spaces. In terms of flight time, the EVO Lite+ has a longer endurance, with up to 40 minutes of flight time compared to the Anafi FPV's 32 minutes.
Auto-Follow Capabilities
As auto-follow drones, both models are designed to track and follow subjects with ease. The Autel Robotics EVO Lite+ features advanced tracking algorithms and a robust obstacle avoidance system, allowing it to maintain a safe distance from the subject while capturing smooth footage. The Parrot Anafi FPV also has a capable auto-follow mode, using its front-facing camera and sensors to track subjects in 3D space. However, the EVO Lite+'s more advanced tracking system and longer range give it an edge in this department.
FPV Experience
For those who enjoy first-person view (FPV) flying, the Parrot Anafi FPV is specifically designed with this experience in mind. The drone comes with a dedicated FPV controller and a high-quality headset, providing an immersive and thrilling experience. While the Autel Robotics EVO Lite+ also supports FPV mode, it doesn't come with a dedicated controller or headset, making the Anafi FPV the better choice for serious FPV enthusiasts.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both the Autel Robotics EVO Lite+ and the Parrot Anafi FPV are exceptional drones that cater to different needs and preferences. The EVO Lite+ excels as an auto-follow drone, with its advanced tracking system and longer range making it ideal for capturing smooth footage of moving subjects. On the other hand, the Parrot Anafi FPV is a better choice for those who prioritize FPV flying and want a more agile, versatile drone. Ultimately, the decision between these two models will depend on your specific requirements and preferences. If you're looking for a robust, high-performance auto-follow drone with exceptional camera capabilities, the Autel Robotics EVO Lite+ might be the better choice. However, if you're an FPV enthusiast or prefer a more agile, portable drone, the Parrot Anafi FPV is definitely worth considering.






























