Search Results
Products are chosen independently by our editors. Purchases made through our links may earn us a commission.
Updated
Pros
  • Excellent directional pickup
  • Detailed and warm audio
  • Robust construction
  • Dual-voice flexibility
  • Durable ribbon material
  • Smooth, detailed sound
Cons
  • Limited frequency response
  • Requires careful placement
  • Expensive
  • Requires careful positioning
Bottom Line
The Beyerdynamic M160 is a compact, double-ribbon microphone known for its directional sound pickup and detailed audio capture, making it a top choice for studio and live recordings.
The Shure KSM313/NE features dual-voice technology, offering two distinct sonic signatures in one microphone, making it a versatile tool for a variety of recording applications.
Frequency Response
40 Hz - 18 kHz
30 Hz - 15 kHz
Sensitivity
1.0 mV/Pa
-54.5 dBV/Pa
Output Impedance
200 ohms
270 ohms
Weight
156 grams
400 grams
Height
3.5 inches
11.3 inches
Length
9.5 inches
7.7 inches
Weight
1 pounds
2.2 Pounds
Width
6.3 inches
3.6 inches
Part Number
730165
KSM313-NE
Model
M 160
KSM313/NE

The world of ribbon microphones is a fascinating one, with many high-quality options available to audio engineers and musicians. Two popular choices in this category are the Beyerdynamic M160 and the Shure KSM313/NE. While both microphones share some similarities, they also have distinct differences that set them apart from one another.

Firstly, let's take a look at the Beyerdynamic M160. This microphone is a classic example of a ribbon microphone, known for its warm and smooth sound quality. The M160 features a hypercardioid polar pattern, which provides excellent rejection of off-axis sound sources and helps to minimize bleed from other instruments or vocals. Its frequency response ranges from 40 Hz to 18 kHz, making it suitable for capturing a wide range of audio sources, from drums and percussion to acoustic guitars and vocals.

On the other hand, we have the Shure KSM313/NE, which is also a ribbon microphone designed for professional recording applications. The KSM313/NE boasts a unique dual-ribbon design, featuring two separate ribbons that are positioned in a bidirectional polar pattern. This allows the microphone to capture sound from both the front and rear, while rejecting sound from the sides. Its frequency response ranges from 30 Hz to 15 kHz, making it well-suited for capturing low-end heavy instruments like bass drums and electric guitars.

One of the main differences between these two microphones is their sound character. The Beyerdynamic M160 is known for its warm and smooth sound, with a gentle high-frequency roll-off that helps to reduce harshness and sibilance. In contrast, the Shure KSM313/NE has a more detailed and accurate sound, with a flatter frequency response that captures a wider range of tonal nuances.

Another key difference is their sensitivity and output level. The Beyerdynamic M160 has a relatively low sensitivity rating of 1.8 mV/Pa, which means it requires a bit more gain to reach optimal levels. On the other hand, the Shure KSM313/NE has a higher sensitivity rating of 2.5 mV/Pa, making it easier to drive and requiring less gain from your preamp or mixer.

In terms of build quality and durability, both microphones are well-constructed and designed to withstand the rigors of professional use. The Beyerdynamic M160 features a rugged metal body with a robust grille that protects the ribbon element, while the Shure KSM313/NE has a sleek and compact design with a hardened steel mesh grille.

When it comes to applications, both microphones are suitable for a wide range of recording tasks. However, the Beyerdynamic M160 is often preferred for capturing vocals, acoustic guitars, and other mid-range heavy instruments, thanks to its warm and intimate sound quality. The Shure KSM313/NE, on the other hand, is well-suited for capturing drums, percussion, and low-end heavy instruments, due to its detailed and accurate sound.

In conclusion, both the Beyerdynamic M160 and the Shure KSM313/NE are high-quality ribbon microphones that offer unique sonic characteristics and advantages. While the M160 excels at capturing warm and intimate sounds, the KSM313/NE shines with its detailed and accurate sound quality. Ultimately, the choice between these two microphones will depend on your specific recording needs and preferences. If you're looking for a classic, warm sound with excellent mid-range response, the Beyerdynamic M160 may be the better choice. However, if you need a microphone that can capture a wide range of tonal nuances with accuracy and detail, the Shure KSM313/NE is definitely worth considering.