When it comes to choosing a reliable and efficient printing solution for home or office use, two popular options stand out among the rest: the Epson EcoTank ET-4850 and the Lexmark MB2236adw. Both of these models fall under the category of all-in-one printers, offering a comprehensive range of features that cater to various printing, scanning, copying, and faxing needs.
Design and Build
The Epson EcoTank ET-4850 boasts a sleek and compact design, measuring 10.2 x 17.6 x 23.4 inches. Its eco-friendly tank system allows for easy ink refill and replacement, reducing waste and minimizing the environmental impact. The printer's build quality is sturdy, with a durable plastic construction that can withstand regular use.
In contrast, the Lexmark MB2236adw has a slightly larger footprint, measuring 11.5 x 15.4 x 19.8 inches. Its design is more traditional, with a focus on functionality rather than aesthetics. The printer's build quality is also robust, with a solid plastic construction that can handle heavy printing volumes.
Printing Performance
The Epson EcoTank ET-4850 excels in terms of printing performance, offering high-quality output at impressive speeds. It can print up to 15 pages per minute (ppm) in black and white, and 8 ppm in color. The printer's ink tank system allows for a high page yield, with up to 7,500 pages in black and 6,000 pages in color.
The Lexmark MB2236adw also delivers excellent printing performance, with speeds of up to 24 ppm in black and white, and 10 ppm in color. However, its page yield is lower compared to the Epson model, with up to 2,500 pages in black and 1,300 pages in color.
Scanning and Copying Capabilities
Both all-in-one printers offer advanced scanning and copying capabilities. The Epson EcoTank ET-4850 features a high-resolution scanner with a maximum resolution of 1200 x 2400 dpi, allowing for precise and detailed scans. Its copying function can produce up to 99 copies at a time, with adjustable zoom and contrast settings.
The Lexmark MB2236adw also boasts a high-quality scanner with a maximum resolution of 1200 x 1200 dpi. Its copying function is equally impressive, with the ability to produce up to 99 copies at a time, and features like automatic document feeder (ADF) and duplex scanning.
Connectivity and Compatibility
The Epson EcoTank ET-4850 offers a range of connectivity options, including Wi-Fi, Ethernet, and USB. It is compatible with various operating systems, including Windows, Mac, and mobile devices. The printer also supports popular cloud printing services like Apple AirPrint and Google Cloud Print.
The Lexmark MB2236adw also features multiple connectivity options, including Wi-Fi, Ethernet, and USB. It is compatible with Windows, Mac, and mobile devices, and supports cloud printing services like Lexmark Mobile Print and Google Cloud Print.
Ink Costs and Maintenance
One of the significant advantages of the Epson EcoTank ET-4850 is its eco-friendly ink tank system, which can significantly reduce ink costs over time. The printer's ink bottles are relatively inexpensive, with a cost per page of around 1 cent for black and white printing, and 2 cents for color printing.
In contrast, the Lexmark MB2236adw uses traditional ink cartridges, which can be more expensive to replace. The printer's ink costs are higher compared to the Epson model, with a cost per page of around 5 cents for black and white printing, and 10 cents for color printing.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both the Epson EcoTank ET-4850 and the Lexmark MB2236adw are excellent all-in-one printers that cater to various printing needs. While the Epson model excels in terms of eco-friendliness, ink costs, and printing performance, the Lexmark printer offers faster printing speeds and advanced scanning capabilities.
Ultimately, the choice between these two models depends on your specific printing requirements and priorities. If you're looking for an environmentally friendly option with low ink costs, the Epson EcoTank ET-4850 is an excellent choice. However, if you prioritize speed and advanced features, the Lexmark MB2236adw may be a better fit.
