- Warm, rich sound
- Wireless streaming capability
- Compact size
- User-friendly controls
- Supports high-resolution audio formats
- Flexible connectivity options
- Excellent build quality
- High-quality sound reproduction
- Limited input options
- Requires external power supply
- Expensive
- No Bluetooth connectivity
Fosi Audio Box X2 vs Cambridge Audio DacMagic 200M
The Fosi Audio Box X2 and Cambridge Audio DacMagic 200M are two digital-to-analog converters (DACs) designed to enhance the audio quality of various devices. While both products aim to provide improved sound reproduction, they differ significantly in terms of features, design, and functionality.
Design and Build
The Fosi Audio Box X2 is a compact, lightweight DAC that measures approximately 4 inches in length and 2 inches in width. Its aluminum alloy construction gives it a sturdy feel, and its small size makes it easy to place on a desk or shelf. In contrast, the Cambridge Audio DacMagic 200M is slightly larger, measuring around 6 inches in length and 4 inches in width. Its metal chassis provides a premium look and feel, with a more substantial weight that suggests higher-quality components.
Audio Quality
Both DACs are capable of producing high-quality audio, but they differ in their approaches to digital-to-analog conversion. The Fosi Audio Box X2 uses an ESS Sabre ES9023 DAC chip, which is known for its clear and detailed sound reproduction. It supports up to 24-bit/384kHz PCM and DSD256, making it suitable for a wide range of audio formats.
The Cambridge Audio DacMagic 200M, on the other hand, employs an ESS Sabre ES9038Q2M DAC chip, which is considered one of the best in its class. This chip provides an even more detailed and nuanced sound, with support for up to 32-bit/768kHz PCM and DSD512. The DacMagic 200M also features a dual mono design, where two separate DACs are used for the left and right channels, resulting in improved channel separation and a wider soundstage.
Preamps and Amplification
One key difference between the two DACs is their approach to preamplifiers. The Fosi Audio Box X2 has a built-in preamp that allows it to drive power amplifiers or active speakers directly. This makes it a convenient option for those who want to connect their DAC directly to their amplifier or speakers.
In contrast, the Cambridge Audio DacMagic 200M does not have a built-in preamp. Instead, it is designed to be used with external preamplifiers or integrated amplifiers that have a preamp stage. This may require additional equipment and cabling, but it also provides more flexibility in terms of system configuration.
Connectivity and Features
Both DACs offer a range of digital inputs, including USB, coaxial, and optical. However, the Cambridge Audio DacMagic 200M has an additional Bluetooth input, which allows for wireless connectivity with devices such as smartphones or tablets.
The Fosi Audio Box X2 has a more limited set of features, with a simple LED indicator that shows the current input and sample rate. The Cambridge Audio DacMagic 200M, on the other hand, has a more comprehensive feature set, including a high-resolution display that shows detailed information about the audio signal, as well as buttons for adjusting settings such as filter type and phase.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the Fosi Audio Box X2 and Cambridge Audio DacMagic 200M are two distinct DACs that cater to different needs and preferences. The Fosi Audio Box X2 is a compact, affordable option that provides good sound quality and a built-in preamp for convenient connectivity. The Cambridge Audio DacMagic 200M, on the other hand, is a more premium product with advanced features, higher-quality components, and a more nuanced sound.
For those who value simplicity and convenience, the Fosi Audio Box X2 may be the better choice. However, for audiophiles who demand the highest possible sound quality and are willing to invest in external preamplifiers or integrated amplifiers, the Cambridge Audio DacMagic 200M is likely the better option. Ultimately, the decision between these two DACs will depend on individual priorities and system requirements.






























