- High-quality construction
- Produces unique images
- Easy to use
- Excellent performance
- High-quality construction
- Easy to use
- Requires learning curve
- May need adjustments in post-processing
- Somewhat expensive
- Limited to 77mm lenses
Hoya R72 vs Tiffen 77mm Infrared Filter
When it comes to capturing stunning infrared photography, two popular options stand out among photographers: the Hoya R72 and the Tiffen 77mm Infrared Filter. Both of these products are categorized as infrared lens filters, designed to block visible light and allow only infrared radiation to pass through, resulting in unique and captivating images.
Similarities:
Both the Hoya R72 and the Tiffen 77mm Infrared Filter are designed to achieve a similar effect: to capture infrared images by blocking visible light and allowing infrared radiation to reach the camera's sensor. They both screw onto the lens thread of a camera, making them easy to use and convenient to carry. Additionally, both filters are made from high-quality materials, ensuring durability and resistance to scratches and damage.
Differences:
One of the primary differences between the two filters is their cut-off wavelength. The Hoya R72 has a cut-off wavelength of 720nm, which means it blocks all light with wavelengths below 720 nanometers and allows only infrared radiation above this threshold to pass through. In contrast, the Tiffen 77mm Infrared Filter has a slightly longer cut-off wavelength of 750nm, resulting in a slightly different tone and color palette in the final image.
Another significant difference is the transmission rate of the two filters. The Hoya R72 has a relatively high transmission rate of around 90%, which means that it allows approximately 90% of the infrared radiation to pass through, resulting in brighter and more vivid images. The Tiffen 77mm Infrared Filter, on the other hand, has a slightly lower transmission rate of around 80%, which can result in slightly darker and more muted tones.
Image Quality:
In terms of image quality, both filters produce unique and stunning results. However, the Hoya R72 tends to produce images with a slightly warmer tone, while the Tiffen 77mm Infrared Filter produces images with a cooler, more neutral tone. The Hoya R72 also tends to produce more contrast and definition in the shadows, resulting in images with deeper blacks and more detailed textures.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, both the Hoya R72 and the Tiffen 77mm Infrared Filter are excellent options for photographers looking to explore the world of infrared photography using infrared lens filters. While they share some similarities, their differences in cut-off wavelength and transmission rate result in distinct image qualities and tones. Ultimately, the choice between these two products will depend on personal preference and the specific look and feel you want to achieve in your photographs.
If you're looking for a filter that produces bright, vivid images with a warm tone, the Hoya R72 may be the better choice. On the other hand, if you prefer a cooler, more neutral tone with slightly darker and more muted results, the Tiffen 77mm Infrared Filter may be the way to go. Regardless of which filter you choose, using infrared lens filters like these can open up a whole new world of creative possibilities and add a unique twist to your photography.






























