Search Results
Products are chosen independently by our editors. Purchases made through our links may earn us a commission.
Updated
Pros
  • Large aperture for clear views
  • Stable and smooth base
  • Excellent for deep-sky objects
  • Portable and easy to transport
  • Precise tracking capabilities
  • Multiple eyepieces for versatility
Cons
  • Heavy and bulky
  • Longer setup time
  • Not as stable as larger models
  • Manual tracking can be challenging
Bottom Line
The Orion 8945 SkyQuest XT8 offers advanced features for hobbyists interested in deep-sky observation and astrophotography. Its large aperture and stable base deliver exceptional performance.
The Meade Instruments Polaris 130 EQ is a portable and compact telescope, perfect for travelers and those with limited space but still want high-quality observations.
Aperture
203 mm
130 mm
Focal Length
1200 mm
650 mm
Focal Ratio
f/5.9
f/5
Mount Type
Dobsonian
Equatorial
Weight
41 lbs
27 lbs
Height
49 inches
61.7 inches
Length
19.25 inches
34 inches
Width
19.25 inches
34 inches
Weight
-
26.8 Pounds
Part Number
8945
216006
Model
8945
216006

The Orion 8945 SkyQuest XT8 and Meade Instruments Polaris 130 EQ are two popular reflector telescopes that cater to astronomy enthusiasts. Both models offer impressive features, but they differ in several key aspects. In this comparison, we'll delve into the details of each telescope, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses to help you make an informed decision.

Optical Design and Performance

The Orion 8945 SkyQuest XT8 is a classic Newtonian reflector telescope with an 8-inch (203mm) aperture and a focal length of 1200mm (f/6). This configuration provides excellent light-gathering capabilities, making it suitable for observing deep-sky objects like nebulae, star clusters, and galaxies. The XT8's parabolic primary mirror ensures sharp, high-contrast images with minimal spherical aberration.

In contrast, the Meade Instruments Polaris 130 EQ features a 5.1-inch (130mm) aperture and a focal length of 650mm (f/5). Although smaller than the XT8, the Polaris 130 EQ still delivers respectable performance for its size. Its Newtonian reflector design and spherical primary mirror provide good image quality, but may exhibit some minor aberrations.

Mounting System

The Orion 8945 SkyQuest XT8 comes with a sturdy, adjustable Dobsonian mount that provides smooth, stable tracking and effortless navigation. The XT8's mount is designed for manual operation, allowing users to easily locate and track celestial objects using the provided navigation tools.

On the other hand, the Meade Instruments Polaris 130 EQ features an equatorial mount (EQ) with slow-motion controls for both altitude and azimuth axes. This type of mount is ideal for tracking celestial objects as they move across the sky, making it suitable for astrophotography and planetary observation. However, the EQ mount may require more setup and adjustment time compared to the Dobsonian mount on the XT8.

Additional Features

Both reflector telescopes come with a range of accessories, including eyepieces, finderscopes, and star diagonals. The Orion 8945 SkyQuest XT8 includes a 25mm and 10mm Sirius Plossl eyepiece, while the Meade Instruments Polaris 130 EQ comes with a 26mm and 9.7mm Super Plössl eyepiece. The XT8 also features a more comprehensive accessory package, including a collimation cap, dust cover, and moon map.

Price and Value

The Orion 8945 SkyQuest XT8 typically retails for around $400-$500, while the Meade Instruments Polaris 130 EQ is usually priced between $250-$350. Considering their respective features and performance, the XT8 offers better value for those seeking a more advanced reflector telescope experience. However, the Polaris 130 EQ remains an attractive option for beginners or casual observers who want a compact, easy-to-use telescope without breaking the bank.

Conclusion

In conclusion, both the Orion 8945 SkyQuest XT8 and Meade Instruments Polaris 130 EQ are capable reflector telescopes that cater to different needs and budgets. The XT8 excels in terms of optical performance, mounting stability, and accessory packages, making it an excellent choice for serious astronomy enthusiasts. On the other hand, the Polaris 130 EQ offers a more compact, user-friendly design with a lower price point, making it suitable for beginners or those seeking a secondary telescope for casual use. Ultimately, the decision between these two reflector telescopes depends on your individual priorities and preferences in an astronomical observing experience.