When it comes to protecting laptops from theft, two popular options are the Targus DEFCON CL and the Kensington MicroSaver 2.0. Both of these products fall under the category of laptop locks, designed to provide an additional layer of security for mobile devices. In this comparison, we'll delve into the features, design, and effectiveness of each product to help you decide which one best suits your needs.
Design and Build
The Targus DEFCON CL boasts a sleek and compact design, making it easy to carry around. It features a sturdy steel cable with a thickness of 6mm, providing a robust defense against cutting tools. The lock head is made of high-strength aluminum, ensuring durability and resistance to tampering. On the other hand, the Kensington MicroSaver 2.0 has a slightly thicker cable (7mm) and a more traditional lock design. Its steel cable is coated with a protective sleeve to prevent scratching and damage to surfaces.
Security Features
Both laptop locks offer excellent security features, but they differ in their approach. The Targus DEFCON CL uses a combination lock with a 6-digit code, allowing users to set their own unique password. This feature provides an additional layer of security, as the combination is not easily guessable. In contrast, the Kensington MicroSaver 2.0 relies on a traditional key-based locking mechanism. While this may seem less secure than a combination lock, Kensington's patented MicroSaver technology ensures that the lock cannot be picked or tampered with.
Ease of Use
In terms of ease of use, both products are relatively straightforward to install and operate. The Targus DEFCON CL comes with a convenient anchor point that can be attached to a desk or table, allowing users to secure their laptop without having to worry about the lock getting in the way. The Kensington MicroSaver 2.0 also features an anchor point, but it requires a bit more effort to install.
Compatibility and Portability
Both laptop locks are designed to be compatible with a wide range of devices, including laptops, tablets, and ultrabooks. However, the Targus DEFCON CL has a slightly longer cable (2m) than the Kensington MicroSaver 2.0 (1.8m), providing more flexibility in terms of placement and movement. In terms of portability, both products are lightweight and compact, making them easy to carry around in a bag or backpack.
Conclusion
When it comes to choosing between the Targus DEFCON CL and the Kensington MicroSaver 2.0, it ultimately depends on your personal preferences and security needs. If you prioritize convenience and ease of use, the Targus DEFCON CL may be the better option, thanks to its combination lock and longer cable. On the other hand, if you prefer a more traditional locking mechanism and are willing to invest in a high-quality product with advanced security features, the Kensington MicroSaver 2.0 is an excellent choice.
In the world of laptop locks, both of these products stand out as reliable and effective solutions for protecting your device from theft. By investing in either the Targus DEFCON CL or the Kensington MicroSaver 2.0, you can enjoy peace of mind knowing that your laptop is securely locked and protected against potential threats.
