Search Results
Products are chosen independently by our editors. Purchases made through our links may earn us a commission.
Updated
Pros
  • Stylish appearance
  • Comfortable to carry
  • Durable material
  • Ample storage space
  • Durable construction
  • Comfortable to wear
Cons
  • Limited specialized compartments
  • Heavier than other models
Bottom Line
The Vans Old Skool III Backpack combines style and practicality, featuring a classic design with modern functionality for skateboarders.
The Eastpak Provider Backpack is known for its large capacity and robust build, making it an excellent choice for skateboarders with a lot of gear.
Material
Polyester
Nylon
Dimensions
16.5 x 12.75 x 4.75 inches
18.9 x 13.4 x 9.4 inches
Weight
1.1 pounds
2.2 pounds
Height
16 inches
-
Length
4 inches
-
Width
12.7 inches
-
Model
Old Skool
-

When it comes to functional and stylish accessories, two products stand out from the crowd: the Vans Old Skool III backpack and the Eastpak Provider backpack. While both are designed for everyday use, they cater to different needs and preferences. In this comparison, we'll delve into the features, design, and functionality of these two products, with a special focus on their suitability as skateboard bags.

Design and Style

The Vans Old Skool III backpack is a classic, laid-back design that screams California cool. With its simple, rectangular shape and bold colorways, it's perfect for those who want to make a statement. The Old Skool III features a sturdy canvas or polyester construction, with reinforced stitching and metal hardware. The iconic Vans logo on the front pocket adds a touch of authenticity.

In contrast, the Eastpak Provider backpack has a more minimalist, urban aesthetic. Its sleek design and clean lines make it a great choice for those who prefer a more understated look. The Provider features a durable nylon or polyester construction, with cleverly designed pockets and compartments to keep your gear organized.

Functionality

Both backpacks are designed for everyday use, but they cater to different needs. The Vans Old Skool III is perfect for casual outings, school, or work, with its spacious main compartment and multiple pockets for organization. It's also a great choice as a skateboard bag, thanks to its sturdy construction and comfortable shoulder straps.

The Eastpak Provider, on the other hand, is designed for those who need a more rugged and feature-rich backpack. With its numerous pockets, compartments, and organizers, it's ideal for travelers, commuters, or students who need to carry a lot of gear. While it may not be as stylish as the Old Skool III, the Provider is a workhorse that can handle heavy use.

Skateboard Bags

When it comes to skateboard bags, both products have their strengths and weaknesses. The Vans Old Skool III is a great choice for skaters who want a simple, no-frills bag to carry their board, clothes, and accessories. Its spacious main compartment can fit a standard skateboard, and the reinforced stitching ensures that your gear stays secure.

The Eastpak Provider, while not specifically designed as a skateboard bag, has some features that make it suitable for skate use. Its multiple pockets and compartments can keep your skate tools, wax, and other accessories organized, and the durable construction can withstand rough handling.

Conclusion

In conclusion, both the Vans Old Skool III and Eastpak Provider backpacks are excellent choices, but they cater to different needs and preferences. If you're looking for a stylish, laid-back skateboard bag with a classic design, the Old Skool III is the way to go. However, if you need a more rugged, feature-rich backpack that can handle heavy use, the Eastpak Provider is the better choice.

Ultimately, the decision comes down to your personal style and needs. If you're a skater who wants a simple, reliable bag to carry your gear, the Vans Old Skool III is a great option. But if you're looking for a more versatile backpack that can handle everything from school to travel to skate sessions, the Eastpak Provider is worth considering.