Search Results
Products are chosen independently by our editors. Purchases made through our links may earn us a commission.
Updated
Pros
  • Multi-functional device
  • High-quality output
  • Efficient and time-saving features
  • Low cost per page
  • Eco-friendly design
  • Rich feature set
  • Easy to use
Cons
  • Expensive ink cartridges
  • Complex initial setup
  • Slower print speed
  • Higher upfront cost
Bottom Line
The HP OfficeJet Pro 9015e All-in-One Printer offers faxing, printing, scanning, and copying capabilities, making it an ideal choice for busy offices.
The Epson EcoTank ET-4760 offers cartridge-free printing with low-cost, refillable ink tanks.
Functions
Print, Fax, Scan, Copy
-
Connectivity
Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB
Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB
Print Speed
22 ppm (black), 18 ppm (color)
15 ppm
ADF Capacity
35 pages
-
Paper Capacity
-
250 sheets
Dimensions
-
14.8 x 13.7 x 9.1 inches
Weight
-
15 lbs
Height
10.94 Inches
9.1 Inches
Length
13.48 Inches
13.7 Inches
Weight
20.43 pounds
15 pounds
Width
17.3 Inches
14.8 Inches
Part Number
1G5L3A#B1H
ET-4760 White
Model
1G5L3A#B1H
ET-4760

The world of all-in-one printers has never been more exciting, with manufacturers like HP and Epson constantly innovating to bring us faster, more efficient, and cost-effective solutions. In this comparison, we'll delve into the features and benefits of two popular models: the HP OfficeJet Pro 9015e and the Epson EcoTank ET-4760. While both printers are designed for heavy-duty use, they differ significantly in their design, functionality, and overall value proposition.

Design and Build

The HP OfficeJet Pro 9015e boasts a sleek and compact design, measuring 12.5 x 16.2 x 10.9 inches. Its sturdy construction and intuitive control panel make it easy to navigate and use. In contrast, the Epson EcoTank ET-4760 has a more substantial footprint, measuring 13.6 x 17.3 x 11.8 inches. However, its bulkier design is largely due to the integrated ink tanks, which we'll discuss later.

Printing Performance

Both printers deliver exceptional print quality, with crisp text and vibrant colors. The HP OfficeJet Pro 9015e has a slightly higher print resolution (2400 x 1200 dpi) compared to the Epson EcoTank ET-4760 (4800 x 1200 dpi). However, the Epson's variable-sized droplet technology ensures more accurate color reproduction.

In terms of speed, the HP OfficeJet Pro 9015e has a slight edge, with print speeds of up to 24 ppm (black) and 20 ppm (color). The Epson EcoTank ET-4760 follows closely, with speeds of up to 15 ppm (black) and 8 ppm (color).

Ink and Toner Costs

This is where the two printers diverge significantly. The HP OfficeJet Pro 9015e uses traditional ink cartridges, which can become costly over time, especially for heavy users. In contrast, the Epson EcoTank ET-4760 features refillable ink tanks, which can hold up to 2 years' worth of ink (based on average usage). This innovative design eliminates the need for frequent cartridge replacements and significantly reduces printing costs.

Multifunctionality

Both printers offer a range of multifunctional features, including scanning, copying, and faxing. Yes, you read that right – these modern devices are essentially fax machines with a plethora of additional capabilities. The HP OfficeJet Pro 9015e has a more comprehensive set of features, including a 24-sheet automatic document feeder (ADF) and support for wireless and Ethernet connectivity.

The Epson EcoTank ET-4760 also boasts an ADF, although it's limited to 10 sheets. However, its wireless connectivity options are more extensive, with support for Wi-Fi Direct, Apple AirPrint, and Google Cloud Print.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the HP OfficeJet Pro 9015e and Epson EcoTank ET-4760 cater to different user needs and preferences. If you prioritize speed, compact design, and a wide range of multifunctional features, the HP OfficeJet Pro 9015e might be the better choice. However, if you're looking for a cost-effective solution with minimal ink replacements and a more environmentally friendly approach, the Epson EcoTank ET-4760 is an excellent option.

While neither printer can replace traditional fax machines in terms of pure faxing capabilities, they both offer a modern take on this classic technology, integrating it seamlessly into their all-in-one designs. Ultimately, the decision between these two printers will depend on your specific printing needs and budget constraints.