Search Results
Products are chosen independently by our editors. Purchases made through our links may earn us a commission.
Updated
Pros
  • Excellent reach and quality
  • Effective image stabilization
  • Fast and quiet autofocus
  • Durable and weather-sealed
  • Great for macro and portraits
  • Effective stabilization
  • Smooth and quiet autofocus
  • Lightweight and compact
Cons
  • Expensive
  • Variable aperture
  • Plastic build
  • Not true 1:1 macro
Bottom Line
Canon's RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM is a super telephoto lens perfect for sports and wildlife photography.
Canon's RF 85mm f/2 Macro IS STM is designed for macro and portrait photography with excellent close-up capabilities.
Focal Length
100-500mm
85mm
Maximum Aperture
f/4.5-7.1
f/2
Minimum Aperture
f/32-54
f/29
Lens Mount
Canon RF
Canon RF
Format Compatibility
Full-Frame
Full-Frame
Filter Size
77mm
67mm
Weight
1370g
500g
Height
9.1 Inches
7.4 Inches
Length
9.1 Inches
5.4 Inches
Weight
3 pounds
1.10010668738 pounds
Width
9.1 Inches
5.4 Inches
Part Number
4112C002
4234C002
Model
4112C002
4234C003(AA)

When it comes to canon lenses, photographers have a wide range of options to choose from, each with its own unique characteristics and features. In this comparison, we'll be taking a closer look at two distinct lenses: the Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM and the Canon RF 85mm f/2 Macro IS STM.

Focal Length and Versatility

The most obvious difference between these two lenses is their focal length range. The Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM is a telephoto zoom lens that covers a wide range of focal lengths, from 100mm to 500mm. This makes it an incredibly versatile lens, suitable for everything from wildlife and sports photography to portrait and landscape photography. On the other hand, the Canon RF 85mm f/2 Macro IS STM is a prime lens with a fixed focal length of 85mm, which is ideal for portrait, macro, and close-up photography.

Aperture and Low-Light Performance

Another key difference between these two lenses is their aperture range. The Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM has a variable aperture that ranges from f/4.5 to f/7.1, depending on the focal length. While this may not be ideal for low-light photography, the lens's image stabilization system helps to mitigate camera shake and blur. In contrast, the Canon RF 85mm f/2 Macro IS STM has a fixed aperture of f/2, which is much wider and allows for more light to enter the lens. This makes it a better choice for low-light photography, such as indoor portraits or close-up shots.

Macro Capabilities

The Canon RF 85mm f/2 Macro IS STM is specifically designed for macro photography, with a minimum focusing distance of 0.35m and a maximum magnification ratio of 1:2. This allows photographers to capture incredibly detailed close-up shots of small subjects, such as insects, flowers, or jewelry. The Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM, on the other hand, is not designed for macro photography and has a minimum focusing distance of 0.9m.

Image Stabilization

Both lenses feature Canon's image stabilization technology, which helps to reduce camera shake and blur caused by handheld shooting or low light conditions. However, the Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM has a more advanced image stabilization system that provides up to 5 stops of correction, while the Canon RF 85mm f/2 Macro IS STM provides up to 3 stops of correction.

Build Quality and Durability

As with all canon lenses, both of these lenses are built to high standards of quality and durability. The Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM features a rugged and weather-sealed design that can withstand the elements, while the Canon RF 85mm f/2 Macro IS STM has a more compact and lightweight design that is ideal for everyday carry.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM and the Canon RF 85mm f/2 Macro IS STM are two distinct lenses that cater to different needs and preferences. The former is a versatile telephoto zoom lens that excels at wildlife, sports, and landscape photography, while the latter is a prime lens that shines at portrait, macro, and close-up photography. When choosing between these two canon lenses, photographers should consider their specific needs and the type of photography they will be doing most often. Ultimately, both lenses offer exceptional image quality and are worthy additions to any photographer's kit.