Search Results
Products are chosen independently by our editors. Purchases made through our links may earn us a commission.
Updated
Pros
  • Excellent image quality
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
  • Effective image stabilization
  • Solid build
  • Excellent reach and quality
  • Effective image stabilization
  • Fast and quiet autofocus
  • Durable and weather-sealed
Cons
  • High price
  • Bulky
  • Expensive
  • Variable aperture
Bottom Line
Canon's RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM is an all-rounder zoom lens offering great image quality and flexibility for various shooting scenarios.
Canon's RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM is a super telephoto lens perfect for sports and wildlife photography.
Focal Length
24-70mm
100-500mm
Maximum Aperture
f/2.8
f/4.5-7.1
Minimum Aperture
f/22
f/32-54
Lens Mount
Canon RF
Canon RF
Format Compatibility
Full-Frame
Full-Frame
Filter Size
82mm
77mm
Weight
900g
1370g
Height
4.9 Inches
9.1 Inches
Length
3.5 Inches
9.1 Inches
Weight
1.97975111276 pounds
3 pounds
Width
3.5 Inches
9.1 Inches
Part Number
3680C005
4112C002
Model
3680C005
4112C002

When it comes to Canon lenses, photographers have a wide range of options to choose from, each with its unique features and capabilities. In this comparison, we'll be taking a closer look at two high-end lenses: the Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM and the Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM.

Focal Length and Versatility

The most obvious difference between these two lenses is their focal length range. The Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM is a standard zoom lens, covering a versatile range of 24-70mm, making it ideal for everyday shooting, portraits, landscapes, and street photography. On the other hand, the Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM is a telephoto zoom lens, offering an impressive range of 100-500mm, perfect for wildlife, sports, and outdoor photography.

Aperture and Low-Light Performance

Another significant difference between these two lenses is their aperture range. The Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM features a constant aperture of f/2.8 throughout its zoom range, allowing for excellent low-light performance and shallow depth of field. In contrast, the Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM has a variable aperture, ranging from f/4.5 at the wide end to f/7.1 at the telephoto end. While this lens may not perform as well in low-light conditions, its longer focal length and image stabilization system help to compensate for this limitation.

Image Stabilization

Both lenses feature Canon's advanced Image Stabilization (IS) technology, which helps to reduce camera shake and blur caused by hand movement or low light. However, the Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM has a more advanced IS system, with up to 5 stops of stabilization, compared to the Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM's 4.5 stops.

Build Quality and Durability

As part of Canon's L-series lineup, both lenses are built to withstand the rigors of professional use. They feature rugged, weather-sealed construction, with high-quality materials and ergonomic design. The Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM is slightly heavier and larger than the Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM, due to its wider aperture and more complex optical design.

Optical Quality

Both lenses are designed to deliver exceptional image quality, with advanced optical designs and high-quality glass elements. The Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM features a complex 21-element design, with multiple aspherical and UD elements, while the Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM has a 20-element design, with several ED and Super UD elements. In terms of optical quality, both lenses are capable of producing stunning images, with excellent sharpness, contrast, and color accuracy.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM and the Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM are two exceptional Canon lenses, each designed for specific applications and use cases. The former is ideal for everyday shooting, portraits, and low-light photography, while the latter excels at wildlife, sports, and outdoor photography. While both lenses share some similarities, their differences in focal length, aperture, and image stabilization make them unique and suited to different types of photography. Ultimately, the choice between these two lenses will depend on your specific needs and preferences as a photographer.